Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Clot-Busting device could change stroke care

NCT ID NCT02880579

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at how well a mechanical device works to remove blood clots from the brain during a stroke. Researchers followed 230 adults who had a stroke within the previous 8 hours and received the procedure. The goal was to see if the treatment helps patients recover and reduces long-term disability.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
mechanical thrombectomy device
What this could lead to
If successful, this could confirm mechanical thrombectomy as a standard treatment for certain types of stroke, helping more patients recover with less disability.
What could go wrong
This is an observational analysis of existing practice, not a randomized trial. Results may not prove the procedure is better than other treatments, and risks like bleeding or vessel damage remain.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

230 people

The number who actually took part.

Start date

May 2013

Finished

Mar 2015

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

200 consecutive patients admitted to a stroke unit for cerebral infarction treated by thrombectomy included (with or without fibrinolysis by intra venous) prospectively over a period of 1 year and 3 months followed for clinical neurological assessment (primary endpoint) .

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Signature of the information notice by the patient or his legal representative * Age\> 18 years * Clinical and imaging consistent with ischemic stroke whose symptoms start back within 8h * Thrombosis (TICI 0 or 1) of the carotid T, M1, M1-M2 bifurcation of the basilar artery occlusion in TANDEM ACI / M1. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant or lactating women * Rapid improvement of NIHSS (gain of more than 4 points) between two pre-treatment assessments. * ASPECT score \<7 on the scanner or \<5 on the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) * Intracranial hemorrhage on imaging * Inability of clinical evaluations at 3 months * extensive lesions of the brain stem (the presence of a complete section of the brainstem hyperintense b1000) * 0 Refusal to participate in the study

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute ischemic stroke due to cerebral artery occlusion are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • CHU de Nantes

    Nantes, 44093, France