Pilates or High-Tech exercise: which eases back pain best?
NCT ID NCT07286760
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two exercise programs—MAT Pilates and MIHA combined exercises—in 40 adults aged 25 to 45 with nonspecific back pain lasting at least 3 months. Researchers measured pain, quality of life, anxiety, and endurance before and after the programs. The goal was to see which approach better helps manage chronic back pain without a clear medical cause.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- exercise programs (MAT Pilates and MIHA combined exercise)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that specific exercise programs help reduce pain and improve quality of life for people with nonspecific back pain.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 40 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Exercise benefits can vary widely between individuals.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
40 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2025
- Finished
-
Dec 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
25 to 45 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Being between 25 and 45 years of age * Having had back pain for the last 3 months * The back pain not being due to a structural, traumatic, infectious, or tumor-related cause (i.e., no specific cause has been identified) * Not having any serious cardiovascular, neurological, or orthopedic conditions that would --prevent participation in a physical exercise program * Not having participated in a regular physical exercise program in the past 6 months * Not having any contraindications to the use of a wearable EMS device (e.g., not having a pacemaker) Exclusion Criteria: * The back pain is associated with a specific pathology (e.g., spinal stenosis, fracture, tumor, infection, etc.) * Being within the first 6 months of pregnancy or postpartum * History of neurological disease (e.g., multiple sclerosis, peripheral neuropathy, spinal cord injury, etc.) * Having a pacemaker or other electronic device in the body * Pre-existing intolerance to EMS
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Low back pain are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Hazal GENÇ
Istanbul, None Selected, 34353, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Radiofrequency device tested as Add-On for stubborn back pain
- Back muscles hold clues for treating recurrent low back pain
- Skip the GP? physiotherapy first for back pain put to the test
- Can yoga ease back pain when recovery looks unlikely?
- Can a second injection target the source of stubborn back pain?
- Can releasing a deep back muscle ease pain and help you breathe better?