Minimally invasive back surgery may offer same benefits with fewer risks
NCT ID NCT01640977
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two surgical techniques for treating lumbar degenerative disc disease: traditional open surgery (open PLIF) and a newer, less invasive version (MAS PLIF). Researchers tracked complications and pain relief in 67 adults who needed spinal fusion. The goal was to see if the less invasive approach could offer similar or better results with fewer side effects.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery, either open or minimally invasive (MAS PLIF)
- What this could lead to
- If MAS PLIF proves safer or equally effective with fewer complications, it could become a preferred surgical option for patients with lumbar disc disease.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, observational study (67 participants) comparing two surgical techniques, not a randomized trial. Results may not apply to all patients, and any surgery carries risks like infection or nerve damage.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
67 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Jun 2012
- Finished
-
Sep 2014
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Existing clinic patients
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects must meet all inclusion criteria to be eligible for enrollment into this observational study: 1. Indicated for posterior lumbar interbody fusion at one or two contiguous motion segments between L1 and S1; 2. 18+ years of age at the date of written informed consent; 3. Able to undergo surgery based on physical exam, medical history and surgeon judgment; 4. Willing and able to return for post-treatment exams according to the follow-up called for in the protocol; 5. Signed and dated informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects presenting with any of the following will not be included in this observational study: 1. Mental or physical condition that would limit the ability to comply with study requirements; 2. Spine abnormality requiring treatment at more than two levels; 3. Prior surgery at operative or adjacent level(s); 4. Involvement in active litigation relating to the spine (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contested); 5. Significant general illness (e.g., HIV, active metastatic cancer of any type, uncontrolled diabetes, dialysis dependent renal failure, symptomatic liver disease); 6. Participating in another clinical study that would confound study data.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Lumbar degenerative disc disease are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Kuether Brain and Spine
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401, United States
-
Nova Neurosurgical Brain and Spine
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401, United States
-
Scott and White Healthcare
Temple, Texas, 76508, United States
-
WellSpan Orthopedics-York
York, Pennsylvania, 17405, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- MRI may reveal who benefits most from physical therapy for back pain
- Stem cells from bone marrow may replace traditional bone graft in spine surgery
- Dye test helps spine surgeons see if They've cleaned enough
- Texting your way to better orthopedic care
- New protein implant could improve spinal fusion outcomes