New pacemaker technique aims to protect heart function
NCT ID NCT07464041
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jul 29, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This study compares a newer pacemaker method, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), to the standard right ventricular pacing in 200 patients with heart block and normal heart function. The goal is to see if LBBAP better preserves the heart's pumping ability and reduces complications like heart failure. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two pacing methods and followed over time.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Left bundle branch area pacing (a type of pacemaker lead placement)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that a newer pacing method preserves heart function better than the standard approach, potentially reducing the risk of heart failure.
- What could go wrong
- This is a relatively early comparison study with 200 participants, and the benefits may not be large or apply to all patients. There is also a risk of lead dislodgement or other complications with the new pacing method.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
200 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
19 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: Patients requiring permanent pacemaker implantation for the following indications: * Third-degree AV block * First- or second-degree AV block with an expected ventricular pacing burden ≥40% * Atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response with an expected ventricular pacing burden ≥40% Exclusion Criteria: * Prior implantation of a cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator * Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50% * Indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy * Life expectancy ≤1 year (e.g., patients not eligible for heart transplantation due to end-stage heart failure, patients with DNR orders, those receiving hospice care after refusal of life-sustaining treatment, or patients with terminal cancer not eligible for chemotherapy or radiotherapy)
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Atrioventricular block are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Samsung Changwon Hospital
Changwon, South Korea
-
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
-
Veterans Health Service Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
-
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, South Korea
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Pacemaker lead position may cut heart rhythm complication
- Can a smarter pacemaker lead save the Heart's pumping power?
- Which pacing target keeps the heart stronger? a trial aims to find out
- Can a pacemaker slip in through the neck vein?
- Can a smarter pacemaker lead placement spare the heart after surgery?
- Could a pacemaker also treat high blood pressure? a new device aims to do both.