Laser vs scalpel: which biopsy hurts less for mouth disease?
NCT ID NCT07414797
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether using a laser for oral biopsies causes less pain and heals better than the standard punch scalpel in people with oral lichen planus. 112 adults were randomly assigned to one of the two methods. Researchers measured wound healing and discomfort after the procedure to see if the laser is a good alternative.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If laser biopsy proves better or equal, it could become the preferred method for diagnosing oral lichen planus, reducing patient discomfort.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center study comparing two procedures, not a treatment. Results may not apply to all patients or settings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
112 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2023
- Finished
-
Mar 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * clinical and histological OLP diagnosis according to the WHO diagnostic criteria modified by van der Meij and van der Waal (4), age ≥18 years * indication for oral incisional biopsy involving the dorsal tongue and buccal mucosa. Exclusion Criteria: * oral lichenoid lesions (OLLs) according to the recent WHO classification of OPMD; * anamnesis of hematopoietic stem cell transplant; * OSCC concomitant with OLP diagnosis, * inability to attend follow-up visits, * psychiatric disorders, * insufficient Italian language comprehension, * local corticosteroid therapy within the previous three months. * chronic pharmacological treatment with drugs known to influence nociceptive sensitivity
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BIOPSY are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli
Roma, RM, 00168, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Augmented reality could steer needles inside the body
- Can a glowing light reveal hidden mouth lesions?
- Can a new biopsy needle collect better tissue samples?
- Aloe vera vs. steroid: which tames oral lichen planus?
- A gentle hand: could better nursing support calm the fear of prostate biopsy?
- Can a common steroid gel quiet oral lichen planus by altering MicroRNAs?