Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New study tests whether No-Cement knee implants outperform traditional ones

NCT ID NCT05630053

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of total knee replacement systems: one that uses cement to hold the implant in place and one that does not. Researchers will track 300 patients with knee pain from arthritis or deformity over 5 years to see which implant leads to better pain relief, function, and survival. The goal is to find out if the cementless version is a safe and effective alternative.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Persona Knee System (cementless and cemented versions)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that a cementless knee replacement works as well or better than the cemented version, potentially offering a longer-lasting option with fewer complications.
What could go wrong
This is a mid-sized study comparing two existing devices, not a breakthrough treatment. Results may not apply to all patients, and there are standard surgical risks like infection or implant loosening.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 300 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jul 2023

Expected to finish

Dec 2032

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

A company

The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient is of legal age and skeletally mature 2. Patient is willing and able to provide written Informed Consent by signing and dating the IRB/EC approved Informed Consent document 3. Patient is willing and able to complete scheduled follow-up evaluations as defined in the study protocol 4. Independent of study participation, patient qualifies for either cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty based upon physical exam and medical history, and meets the approved indications for use of the commercially available Persona Keel Knee System with appropriately matched Zimmer Biomet components implanted in accordance with product labeling. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient is unwilling to sign the Informed Consent 2. Patient is currently participating in any other surgical intervention or pain management study 3. Patient is pregnant or considered a member of a protected (vulnerable) population whose inclusion in the study would be inappropriate (e.g., prisoner; pediatric patients) 4. Patient has a mental or neurologic condition who is unwilling or incapable of following postoperative care instructions 5. Patient has a condition which would, in the judgement of the Investigator, place the patient at undue risk or interfere with the conduct of the study 6. Patient is institutionalized or is a known drug abuser, a known alcoholic or cannot understand the requirements of study participation 7. Patient is scheduled to undergo simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty Study Device-Specific Exclusion Criteria: 8. Previous history of infection in the affected joint and/or other local/systematic infection that may affect the prosthetic joint 9. Insufficient bone stock on femoral or tibial surfaces. 10. Neuropathic arthropathy 11. Osteoporosis or any loss of musculature or neuromuscular disease that compromises the affected limb 12. A stable, painless arthrodesis in a satisfactory functional position 13. Severe instability secondary to the absence of collateral ligament integrity 14. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) accompanied by an ulcer of the skin or a history of recurrent breakdown of the skin 15. The kinematic alignment surgical technique is contraindicated for patients with greater than 5° valgus deformity with MCL insufficiency

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Avascular necrosis are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute

    Alexandria, Virginia, 22306, United States

  • Centura Health

    Westminster, Colorado, 80023, United States

  • Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21224, United States

  • Lehigh Valley Hospital - Dickson City

    Dickson City, Pennsylvania, 18519, United States

  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

  • Oregon Health & Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 972329, United States

  • Rothman Institute

    Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, 19010, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.