Knee cartilage showdown: which surgery wins?
NCT ID NCT00560664
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two surgical methods to repair damaged knee cartilage: a newer cell-based technique (autologous chondrocyte implantation) and a standard bone-graft method (mosaicoplasty). 58 adults aged 18-50 with isolated knee lesions took part. The goal was to see which approach provides better knee function and healing after 2 years.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 3
Large-scale testing in a bigger group. Usually the last step before a treatment can be approved.
- Participants
-
58 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Apr 2007
- Finished
-
Aug 2013
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 50 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * isolated femoral osteochondral lesion * aged 18 to 50 * grade 3 or 4 lesion (ICRS) sized 2,5 cm2 to 7,5 cm2. * IKDC score below 55 Exclusion Criteria: * pregnancy * allergy * arthrosis * varus or valgus angle greater than 10° * ACL laxity * Severe chronic disease * BMI \> 30 Kg/m2 * HIV, B or C Hepatitis
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Knee chondral or osteochondral defect are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CH Nord Mayenne
Mayenne, 53 103, France
-
CHU de Caen
Caen, 14 033, France
-
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, 38 042, France
-
CHU de Lyon
Lyon, Lyon, 69300, France
-
CHU de Nancy
Nancy, 54 035, France
-
CHU de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67 400, France
-
Centre médico chirurgical de Dracy-Le-Fort
Dracy-le-Fort, 71 640, France
-
Ch Versailles
Le Chesnay, 78 150, France
-
Clinique Chenieux
Limoges, 87 000, France
-
Clinique du cours Dillon
Toulouse, France
-
HIA Bégin
Saint-Mandé, 94 160, France
-
Orthopaedic surgery Departement Brest University Hospital
Brest, 29200, France