Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New heart valve procedure could offer a gentler option for leaky valve patients

NCT ID NCT06608823

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Sep 18, 2026 · Updated 7 times

Summary

This study tests a new, less invasive way to replace a leaky aortic heart valve (aortic regurgitation) using a device called the JenaValve Trilogy, compared to standard open-heart surgery. About 1,000 people with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation will be randomly assigned to get either the new procedure or surgery. Researchers will track deaths, strokes, and unplanned heart-related hospital stays over 12 months to see if the new method is as safe and effective as surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
JenaValve Trilogy transcatheter heart valve system
What this could lead to
If successful, this could offer a less invasive alternative to open-heart surgery for people with a leaky aortic valve, potentially reducing recovery time and hospital stays.
What could go wrong
This is a large trial but still experimental for this specific condition. The new device may not be as durable as surgical valves, and there are risks like stroke or need for rehospitalization.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 1,016 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jun 2025

Expected to finish

Feb 2036

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

A company

The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Clinical indication for AVR for native valve predominant AR defined as: 1. Class I or II indication for AVR according to ACC/AHA or ESC/EACTS guidelines with moderate to severe or severe AR (Grade ≥3+) on transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography or cardiac MRI as assessed by the core laboratory OR 2. AR severity that remains indeterminate despite core laboratory review of all imaging including at least one advanced imaging modality (TEE or cardiac MRI) AND evidence of left ventricular damage\* from AR with unanimous agreement from the local heart team, an independent clinical evaluation committee and the CRB that the symptomatic subject (NYHA II or greater) will benefit from SAVR for AR 2. The subject is a candidate for TAVR using the Trilogy THV system and SAVR using a commercially approved bioprosthetic heart valve 3. Subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits 4. Subject meets the legal minimum age to provide informed consent based on local regulatory requirements Exclusion Criteria: 1. Confirmed moderate (2+) or less AR severity by core laboratory evaluation 2. Estimated life expectancy of less than 24 months due to associated non- cardiac comorbid conditions 3. Subject is high-risk for SAVR as determined by the local heart team 4. Subject refuses SAVR as a treatment option 5. Subject refuses a blood transfusion 6. Subject is selected for aortic valve repair or aortic surgery 7. Marfan syndrome or other known connective tissue disease that would necessitate aortic root replacement/intervention 8. Subject unable to undergo pre-procedure CT scan analysis for annular sizing 9. Mitral or tricuspid disease, considered clinically significant, such that if randomized to surgery, repair or replacement would be expected. 10. Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to all anticoagulation/antiplatelet medications (or inability to be anticoagulated for the index procedure), nitinol, or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated 11. Hostile chest or conditions or complications from a prior surgery that would preclude safe reoperation (i.e., mediastinitis, radiation damage, chest wall abnormalities, adhesion of aorta or internal mammary artery (IMA) to the sternum) 12. Need for emergency surgery or TAVR for any reason 13. Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or need for mechanical circulatory support 14. Ongoing sepsis or active infective endocarditis with ongoing antibiotic (including suppressive) therapy or positive blood cultures within 6 weeks 15. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation within 30 days of randomization 16. LVEF \<25% according to core laboratory measurement of resting echocardiogram at time of screening 17. Moderate to severe or worse right ventricular dysfunction on resting echocardiogram according to core laboratory 18. Severe chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh C) or any active liver disease 19. Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4 or 5 (\<30 cc/min/1.73 m2 or dialysis) 20. Severe Pulmonary Hypertension (pulmonary arterial systolic pressure * amp;amp;gt;2/3 systemic systolic pressure) 21. Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with FEV1 * amp;amp;lt;50% predicted or need for chronic supplementary oxygen 22. Blood dyscrasia as defined: leukopenia (WBC \<3,000 Cells/μL), thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<50,000 Cells/μL), or anemia (hemoglobin \<9.0 g/dL) that is uncorrected prior to randomization 23. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that is not adequately treated 24. Active gastrointestinal bleeding precluding anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy 25. Any condition considered a contraindication to mechanical circulatory support 26. Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation (i.e., resting heart rate \>120 bpm) 27. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤30 days before the index AVR 28. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed ≤30 days prior to AVR (Subjects with placement of coronary or peripheral stent(s) should be assessed for the ability to safely proceed with SAVR within the protocol timeframe) 29. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease or successful treatment of carotid stenosis within six weeks of randomization 30. Prior stroke with residual modified Rankin Score ≥2 31. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months of randomization 32. Body mass index (BMI) \<20 or \>50 kg/m2 33. Currently participating in a cardiovascular investigational drug or device trial and has not yet completed follow-up for the primary endpoint (excluding registries) 34. Severe cognitive decline (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits) 35. Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of the investigator preclude the subject from appropriate consent or adherence to the protocol required follow-up exams 36. Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant prior to completion of all protocol follow-up requirements 37. Anatomical exclusion criteria (ANY of the following): 1. Congenital bicuspid, unicuspid or quadricuspid aortic valve verified by echocardiography or CCT core laboratory 2. Native aortic annulus perimeter \<66 mm or \>90 mm per the core laboratory reading of baseline cardiac CT imaging 3. Iliofemoral arteries with vessel characteristics unsuitable for sheath passage (e.g., calcification, tortuosity) as determined by the case review board (CRB) 4. Significant abdominal or thoracic aortic disease (such as porcelain aorta, aneurysm, severe calcification, aortic coarctation) that would preclude safe passage of the delivery system or cannulation and aortotomy for SAVR 5. According to the CRB, a combination of aortic root angulation (angle between the plane of the aortic valve annulus and horizontal plane/vertebrae), sinus size, and straight length of the aorta that will not allow safe device delivery and THV deployment 6. Sinus of Valsalva anatomy that would prevent adequate coronary perfusion after valve implantation 38. According to core laboratory evaluation, severe aortic stenosis 39. Uncorrected hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy 40. Echocardiographic or Multi-slice CT (MSCT) evidence of untreated intracardiac mass or vegetation 41. Left ventricular thrombus 42. Left atrial thrombus without continuous appropriate anticoagulation within 90 days of the study procedure 43. Complex coronary artery disease: 1. Unprotected left main coronary artery disease ≥50% 2. Syntax score \>32 (in the absence of prior revascularization) 3. Heart Team determines that optimal revascularization cannot be adequately performed with EITHER CABG at the time of SAVR OR PCI at least 30 days prior to THV implant.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Aortic insufficiency are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    34 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ascension St. Vincent Heart Center

    RECRUITING

    Carmel, Indiana, 46290, United States

  • BayCare Health

    RECRUITING

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756, United States

  • Baylor Scott & White Health

    RECRUITING

    Plano, Texas, 75074, United States

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02420, United States

  • Buffalo General Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    Buffalo, New York, 14203, United States

  • CPMC Sutter Health

    RECRUITING

    Burlingame, California, 94010, United States

  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States

  • Columbia University Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    New York, New York, 10032, United States

  • Deborah Heart and Lung Center

    RECRUITING

    Browns Mills, New Jersey, 08015, United States

  • Emory University Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30308, United States

  • HCA North Florida

    RECRUITING

    Gainesville, Florida, 32605, United States

  • Heart Care Centers of IL / Hinsdale Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Chicago, Illinois, 60521, United States

  • Henry Ford Health

    RECRUITING

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States

  • Houston Methodist Research Institute

    RECRUITING

    Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

  • Intermountain Health

    RECRUITING

    Murray, Utah, 84107, United States

  • Lankenau Institute for Medical Research

    RECRUITING

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19096, United States

  • Los Robles Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    Thousand Oaks, California, 91360, United States

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

  • Mayo Clinic

    RECRUITING

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center

    RECRUITING

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States

  • Medical University of South Carolina

    RECRUITING

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States

  • Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation

    RECRUITING

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States

  • Ohio Health

    RECRUITING

    Columbus, Ohio, 43214, United States

  • Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)

    RECRUITING

    Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

  • Piedmont Healthcare

    RECRUITING

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30369, United States

  • Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

    RECRUITING

    New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States

  • Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City

    RECRUITING

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64131, United States

  • Scripps Health

    RECRUITING

    La Jolla, California, 92037, United States

  • Sentara Norfolk

    RECRUITING

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States

  • The Christ Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States

  • The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

    RECRUITING

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

  • University of Michigan

    RECRUITING

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

  • University of Washington

    RECRUITING

    Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States

  • Washington University - Barnes Jewish Hospital

    RECRUITING

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.