Which interdental cleaner wins for gum health?
NCT ID NCT07150910
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study compared interdental brushes and rubber bristle cleaners in 40 adults with gingivitis (early gum disease). Participants used one of the two tools for four weeks. Researchers measured plaque removal and gum bleeding, and also asked about satisfaction. The goal was to see which tool works better and is preferred by users.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- interdental brush and rubber bristle interdental cleaner
- What this could lead to
- If one tool proves better, it could guide dentists and patients toward more effective daily gum care.
- What could go wrong
- This was a small, short-term study (40 people) with no blinding, so results may not apply broadly or show lasting benefits.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
40 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2021
- Finished
-
Aug 2022
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 35 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * probing sulcus depth ≤ 3 mm and full-mouth bleeding on probing (BOP) score ≥ 20% * presence of at least 20 natural teeth (excluding third molars), with a minimum of five teeth per quadrant * at least four evaluable interproximal sites without crowns or restorations in each quadrant of the maxilla and mandible * compatibility of both interdental cleaning devices with a minimum of four interproximal spaces per quadrant * no prior experience with interdental cleaning tools * willing to participate * capable of understanding and complying with the study procedures and instructions. Exclusion Criteria: * smoking * presence of severe gingivitis or clinical attachment loss * systemic diseases * use of antibiotics within the past three months * use of anticoagulant medications or mouthwashes * pregnancy or lactation.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Gingivitis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University
Zonguldak, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Seeing your gums in 3D: can personalized images spark better brushing?
- Can plain water replace a common ICU mouthwash?
- Gum fluid holds clues to Behçet's disease puzzle
- Can a special toothpaste tame gum disease?
- Could a toothbrush and mouthwash cut pneumonia in the elderly?
- Electric flosser may tackle plaque and gum bleeding better than brushing alone