Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Can community deliberation fix consent for teens in HIV research?

NCT ID NCT05371327

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested a method called public deliberation to improve how researchers get consent from teens for HIV prevention studies. 128 participants from diverse communities discussed ethical conflicts around parental permission versus teen self-consent. The goal was to see if this group process could lead to better, fairer consent approaches for sensitive research.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this approach could lead to fairer, safer consent processes for teens in sensitive health research.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study that tested a method, not a treatment. Results may not apply to all communities or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

128 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Apr 2021

Finished

Aug 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Deliberants will include both adolescents/young adults and adults. They need to live, work, or engage with communities with youth at risk for HIV. Communities can be geographic communities, LGBTQ communities, Black or Latinx communities, etc.

Ages

14 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria - Deliberants must: * Complete the screening survey; * Be at least 14 years of age; * Speak and understand English; and, * Be able to commit to attend all virtual deliberation sessions in their entirety. * Be one of the following: * 14-21years old * Have an adolescent who lives with you * Closely involved with an adolescent on a regular basis (e.g. grandparent, adult sibling) * Work for an organization or program that is invested in the wellbeing of adolescents in your community (e.g. social worker, high school teacher, nonprofit work) * Part of an organization or program that is invested in the wellbeing of adolescents in your community (e.g. mentor, volunteer, church youth group) Exclusion Criteria: * Those who are obviously inebriated or high at the time of screening, the deliberation event, or the pre-/post-event interviews; * Those who reside in a home with another eligible participant

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HIV infections are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Indiana University School of Medicine and School of Nursing

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46220, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.