Can community deliberation fix consent for teens in HIV research?
NCT ID NCT05371327
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested a method called public deliberation to improve how researchers get consent from teens for HIV prevention studies. 128 participants from diverse communities discussed ethical conflicts around parental permission versus teen self-consent. The goal was to see if this group process could lead to better, fairer consent approaches for sensitive research.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this approach could lead to fairer, safer consent processes for teens in sensitive health research.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study that tested a method, not a treatment. Results may not apply to all communities or settings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HIV INFECTIONS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Indiana University School of Medicine and School of Nursing
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46220, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a plasma beam stop anal lesions from becoming cancer?
- Can an AI chatbot calm nerves before a C-Section as well as a doctor?
- Can a chatbot make clinical trial consent clearer?
- Can resilience defeat HIV stigma? a new study investigates
- Peer support may curb HIV stigma and stress in vietnamese gay men
- A pharmacist's touch: could structured medication reviews boost HIV treatment success?