Digital vs. traditional: which dental implant impression is more accurate?
NCT ID NCT07393269
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This completed study tested how accurately different methods capture the position of dental implants. Twenty-two patients with missing back teeth received two implants each. Researchers compared a digital scan using special healing caps to two traditional putty-based techniques. The goal was to see which method gives the most precise 3D fit for the final tooth replacement.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help dentists choose more accurate impression methods for dental implants, potentially improving fit and longevity of restorations.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 22 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or implant types. It measures accuracy, not long-term clinical outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
22 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2025
- Finished
-
Nov 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
40 to 70 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Partially edentulous patients with unilateral free-end saddle (Kennedy Class II) * Adequate bone for two implants * Good systemic health * Ability to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Active periodontal disease * Poor oral hygiene * Parafunctional habits * Temporomandibular disorders * Heavy smoking (\>10 cigarettes/day)
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Partially edentulous maxilla, mandible are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.