Digital vs. traditional: which dental implant impression is more accurate?

NCT ID NCT07393269

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This completed study tested how accurately different methods capture the position of dental implants. Twenty-two patients with missing back teeth received two implants each. Researchers compared a digital scan using special healing caps to two traditional putty-based techniques. The goal was to see which method gives the most precise 3D fit for the final tooth replacement.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If successful, this could help dentists choose more accurate impression methods for dental implants, potentially improving fit and longevity of restorations.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed trial with only 22 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or implant types. It measures accuracy, not long-term clinical outcomes.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PARTIALLY EDENTULOUS MAXILLA, MANDIBLE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

    Cairo, Egypt