Which rapid COVID test is more accurate? a Head-to-Head showdown
NCT ID NCT04403035
First seen Aug 10, 2026 · Last updated Aug 11, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two rapid point-of-care tests for COVID-19: the ID NOW and the Accula. The goal is to see which one is more accurate at detecting the virus, by measuring sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Adults who need a COVID-19 test or have already tested positive are eligible to participate. The results could help hospitals choose the better test for quick and reliable diagnosis.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Two rapid diagnostic tests: ID NOW and Accula
- What this could lead to
- If one test proves more accurate, it could become the preferred choice for quick COVID-19 detection, leading to faster isolation and treatment decisions.
- What could go wrong
- The trial is small and early, and results may not apply to all settings. Also, rapid tests can sometimes miss infections, so accuracy may vary.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Started
-
May 2020
- Expected to finish
-
May 2021
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Adult patients with orders for rapid COVID-19 testing who have consented to participate will be included in the study.
- Ages
-
18 to 95 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Covid-19 testing has been ordered in the Emergency Dept. or for inpatients in the hospital or patient has already tested positive via PCR. * Adult patients * Consent obtained Exclusion Criteria: * Testing not ordered or tested negative via PCR. * Children * Do not consent
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for COVID -19 are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Ascension St. John Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48236, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Home antibody tests put to the test: can you read your own COVID-19 result?
- Can lung ultrasound reveal COVID-19's signature in the lungs?
- When the immune system Can't fight back: tracking three respiratory viruses
- The household maze: how does COVID-19 move between family members?
- Can an oral drug stop COVID-19 from turning deadly?
- Can COVID-19 rapid tests slip into HIV and TB clinics without disrupting care?