Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Ice or cream? study tests cheaper pain relief for laser hair removal

NCT ID NCT02318654

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 01, 2026 · Last updated Jul 02, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two ways to reduce pain during laser hair removal of the armpits: a simple ice pack or a numbing cream called EMLA. Thirty women will have one armpit treated with ice and the other with EMLA before laser treatment. The goal is to see which method works better for pain control.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Ice pack and EMLA cream (lidocaine/prilocaine)
What this could lead to
If ice works as well as EMLA, it could offer a cheaper, faster, and needle-free way to ease pain during laser hair removal.
What could go wrong
This is a small pilot study with only 30 women, so results may not apply to everyone. EMLA can cause skin reactions, and ice may not numb deeply enough.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Phase 4

Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.

Participants

About 30 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Dec 2014

Expected to finish

Dec 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 65 years

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria 1. Subjects are Caucasian or Asian females. 2. Subjects are 18-65 years old. 3. Subjects have Fitzpatrick skin type I-III and coarse dark axillary hair. 4. Subjects are in good health. 5. Subjects can provide informed consent. 6. Subjects have the willingness and the ability to understand and communicate with the investigators. Exclusion Criteria 1. Subjects who are allergic to lidocaine or prilocaine. 2. History of methemoglobinemia. 3. History of recurrent petechial or purpuric lesions. 4. Bleeding tendency or coagulopathy. 5. History of laser treatment in axilla. 6. History of keloid or hypertrophic scarring. 7. Pregnant or lactating or intends to become pregnant in the next 3 months. 8. Active skin disease or skin infection in the treatment area. 9. Subjects with known mental illness or other psychological conditions, such as psychotic disorders, mood disorders, anxiety disorders and cognitive disorders. 10. History of cold urticaria. 11. History of current injury or abnormal skin sensation. 12. Unable to understand the protocol or to give informed consent. 13. Any other condition that would, in the professional opinion of the investigator, potentially affect response or participation in the clinical clinical study, or would pose as an unacceptable risk to subject.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Hair removal are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States