Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Could a home sleep test beat the hospital for diagnosing apnea?

NCT ID NCT07744880

Diagnosis Sponsor: Escola Superior de Ciencias da Saude Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Aug 04, 2026 · Last updated Aug 05, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial tests whether performing a sleep study at home through primary care is more cost-effective than the standard hospital-based approach for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea. Adults with suspected apnea will be randomly assigned to either home testing via their local health unit or the usual scheduling system. The study compares costs, wait times, and patient satisfaction to see if the home strategy could ease the burden on Brazil's public health system.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Home polysomnography (sleep study) performed by primary care health professionals
What this could lead to
If home sleep testing in primary care proves more cost-effective, it could reduce wait times and improve access to sleep apnea diagnosis in public health systems.
What could go wrong
The trial is small (60 participants) and results may not apply broadly. Home testing may be less accurate than in-lab studies, and cost-effectiveness depends on local healthcare factors.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 60 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Sep 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Sep 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * aged 18 years or older; * present clinical suspicion of OSA, confirmed by screening using the STOP-BANG and Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaires; * be receiving care at Basic Health Units (UBS), or be registered on the Central Regulation waiting list system for polysomnography (PSG); Exclusion Criteria: * use of home oxygen therapy; * use of invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation; * use of a tracheostomy; * change of residence during the data collection period; * known allergy to materials used in sleep monitoring equipment.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  2. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.