Can a gentler oxygen flow keep breathing steady during eye surgery?
NCT ID NCT04055077
First seen Aug 17, 2026 · Last updated Sep 01, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This trial tests whether high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) keeps breathing and oxygen levels steadier than standard low-flow nasal oxygenation (LFNO) in patients undergoing sedated vitrectomy, a type of eye surgery. Participants are normal-weight adults with different anesthesia risk levels. The study compares how well each oxygen method maintains blood oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, breathing pattern, heart rate, and blood pressure during the procedure.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- High-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) compared with low-flow nasal oxygenation (LFNO) during sedated eye surgery
- What this could lead to
- If HFNO proves better at maintaining stable breathing and oxygen levels during sedated eye surgery, it could become the preferred oxygen method for higher-risk patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-center trial with a modest number of participants, and results may not apply to all surgical settings. HFNO may also cause discomfort or not significantly outperform standard low-flow oxygen.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
176 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jun 2022
- Finished
-
Sep 2023
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
25 to 85 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * normal weight ASA patients of risk class I, II and III * moderate multimodal analgo-sedatiom * pars plana vitrectomy Exclusion Criteria: * Conventional vitrectomy * Obesity * Diseases of peripheral blood vessels * Hematological diseases * Psychiatric diseases * Sideropenic anemia * Patient's refusal * Ongoing chemotherapy or irradiation * remifentanyl and benzodiazepine allergies
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Airway management are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University clinical hospital centre Zagreb, Croatia
Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Muscle relaxant dose may hold key to better breathing tube alternative
- When cancer blocks the airway, doctors lack a playbook. experts aim to write one.
- The 3 AM intubation: does fatigue make airway management more dangerous?
- Can thin air curb your appetite? chamber study tests Oxygen's role in eating
- Ultrasound could flag tough airways before cancer surgery
- Can a machine breathe better than a nurse? automated oxygen system tested in COPD