Shocking the hand back to life: which stimulator works best after stroke?
NCT ID NCT03574623
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
After a stroke, many people struggle to open their affected hand. This study tested two types of electrical stimulation—one that cycles on and off automatically, and another that is controlled by the good hand—plus standard occupational therapy. 132 stroke survivors took part to see which approach best improves hand dexterity and movement.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Electrical stimulator (device) and occupational therapy
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could point toward a more effective way to help stroke survivors regain hand function and independence.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed trial comparing existing therapies, so no major new breakthrough is expected. Results may show only modest differences between treatments.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
132 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Feb 2019
- Finished
-
Oct 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
21 to 90 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * 6 to 24 months since a first clinical cortical or subcortical, hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic stroke * unilateral upper limb hemiparesis with finger extensor strength of grade no more than 4 out of 5 on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale * score of at least 1 and no more than 11 out of 14 on the hand section of the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment * adequate active movement of the shoulder and elbow to position the hand in the workspace for table-top task practice (necessary for the lab task practice sessions) * able to follow 3-stage commands * able to recall at least 2 of a list of 3 items after 30 minutes * skin intact on the hemiparetic arm * surface stimulation of the paretic finger and thumb extensors produces functional hand opening without pain (this will exclude those who have too much flexor spasticity) * able to hear and respond to cues from stimulator * not receiving occupational therapy (no concomitant OT) * full voluntary opening/closing of the contralateral (less affected) hand * demonstrates ability to follow instructions for operating the stimulator or have a caregiver who will assist them Exclusion Criteria: * co-existing neurologic diagnosis of peripheral nerve injury, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, or multiple sclerosis * uncontrolled seizure disorder * brainstem stroke * uncompensated hemineglect * severe shoulder or hand pain * insensate forearm or hand * history of potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmias with hemodynamic instability * implanted electronic systems (e.g. pacemaker) * botulinum toxin injections to any upper extremity muscle within 3 months of enrolling * pregnant women due to unknown risks of surface NMES during pregnancy * lack of functional passive range of motion of the wrist or fingers of affected side * diagnosis (apart from stroke) that substantially affects paretic arm and hand function * deficits in communication that interfere with reasonable study participation * lacking sufficient visual acuity to see the stimulator's display * concurrent enrollment in another investigational study
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Hemiplegia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Emory University and Atlanta VA
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
-
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
-
Kessler Foundation
West Orange, New Jersey, 07052, United States
-
MetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a checklist and heart monitor stop repeat strokes?
- Heart hole or stroke trigger? global registry tracks who gets closure and what happens next
- Zapping the spine while wearing a robotic ankle: a new way to help kids walk?
- Can a nurse and a neighbor help tame chronic disease?
- Can PET scans reveal hidden heart inflammation after a stroke?
- Two ways to catch a hidden heart rhythm after stroke