Gum surgery showdown: which technique gives thicker, healthier gums?
NCT ID NCT07200258
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two surgical techniques (MCAT and VISTA) for treating receding gums in 44 healthy adults. Both methods use a tissue graft to cover exposed roots. Researchers will measure gum thickness changes over 12 months using 3D scans to see which technique works better.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 44 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Oct 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Jul 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Periodontally and systemically healthy adults (age ≥ 18 years). * At least two adjacent sites exhibiting gingival recessions classified as recession type 1 (RT1) o type 2 (RT2) (Cairo et al., 2011), associated with dental hypersensitivity or aesthetic concerns. * Presence ≥2 mm depth on at least one recession * Smokers ≤ 10 cigarettes. * Full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores ≤20%. * Patients being able to maintain good oral hygiene. Exclusion Criteria: * Compromised general health. * Pregnancy or attempting to get pregnant (self-reported). * Untreated periodontal diseases * Presence of: (i) severe tooth malposition; (ii) root caries or inadequate prosthetic restorations; (iii) previous periodontal plastic surgery at the experimental sites. * Smokers \>10 cigarettes
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Gingival recession are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University Complutense of Madrid
RECRUITINGMadrid, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Gum graft surgery: does the bed matter for thin gums?
- Boosting gum grafts: do blood or gel Add-Ons reduce shrinkage?
- Can a new flap technique better cover receding gums?
- A new twist on gum surgery could better cover exposed roots
- Gum graft boost: growth factors may strengthen receding gum repair
- Micro-needling vs. gum graft: a tiny trial tests a simpler fix for receding gums