Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Can group exercise classes beat One-on-One therapy for bladder control?

NCT ID NCT02039830

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tests whether group physiotherapy is as good as individual sessions for treating urinary incontinence in women aged 60 and older. Over 360 participants will receive either weekly group classes or one-on-one therapy for 12 weeks, both focusing on pelvic floor exercises and education. The goal is to see if the group approach is a cost-effective alternative that could be offered as a first-line treatment.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
physiotherapy (pelvic floor muscle training and education)
What this could lead to
If group therapy works as well as individual sessions, it could offer a more affordable and accessible treatment option for older women with urinary incontinence.
What could go wrong
This is a non-inferiority trial, so group therapy might prove less effective. Results may not apply to all women, and the study is not testing a new drug or cure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

362 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jul 2012

Expected to finish

Dec 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

60 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * 60 years or older * suffering from stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) symptoms * at least 3 urinary incontinence episodes per week x 3 months or more * ambulatory without the need of assisted device * understand French or English instruction * hormonal replacement stable for 6 months Exclusion Criteria: * present risk factors known to interfere with the effects of PFM training * \>2 degree Pop-Q * body mass index \>35 * chronic constipation * have received physiotherapy or surgical treatment within the last year

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Urinary incontinence are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

female stress incontinence Urinary Incontinence Urinary Incontinence, Stress

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Laboratoire incontinence et vieillissement CRIUGM

    Montreal, Quebec, H3W 1W5, Canada

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.