A 5-hour test may replace days of waiting for the right antibiotic in blood infections
NCT ID NCT06174649
First seen Jul 28, 2026 · Last updated Jul 29, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial tests whether a rapid diagnostic test called Reveal can improve outcomes for hospitalized patients with gram-negative bloodstream infections. The test measures bacterial growth by detecting gases they release, giving results in about 5 hours instead of the usual 2-3 days. Patients are randomly assigned to receive either standard testing or the rapid test plus standard care, and researchers track survival, complications, and recovery up to 30 days.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- a rapid diagnostic test called Reveal that measures bacterial growth by detecting volatile metabolites
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this rapid test could help doctors choose the right antibiotic hours sooner, potentially reducing complications and deaths from bloodstream infections.
- What could go wrong
- The test may not work as well in all settings or for all bacteria, and faster results do not guarantee better outcomes. The trial is still testing this question.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
899 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2023
- Finished
-
Jun 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Positive blood culture with Gram stain showing GNB. 2. Hospitalized at the time of Gram stain result. 3. Enrolled within 16 hours of blood culture positivity. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Positive blood culture for GNB within the prior 7 days (if known at the time of Gram stain result). 2. Deceased at the time of Gram stain result. 3. Gram-positive bacilli, Gram-positive cocci, Gram-negative cocci, yeast, fungi, or multiple morphologies of GNB detected on Gram stain of blood culture. 4. Previous enrollment in this study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Bloodstream infection are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Attikon University General Hospital
Chaïdári, Attica, 12462, Greece
-
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC) Sergas
A Coruña, 15006, Spain
-
Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore
Attāvara, Mangalore, 575001, India
-
Meir Medical Center
Kfar Saba, 4428162, Israel
-
Rambam Health Care Campus
Haifa, 3109601, Israel
-
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
-
Tzaneio General Hospital
Piraeus, 18536, Greece
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a computer model speed up sepsis blood tests?
- Can kids with blood infections skip the IV earlier?
- AI could outsmart bacteria: a smarter way to choose antibiotics?
- Could one blood draw be enough to catch dangerous infections?
- Which works better: one antibiotic or two for this superbug?
- New antibiotic under the microscope: can it beat superbug infections?