Which liver biopsy method wins? new study pits EUS against ultrasound
NCT ID NCT06047327
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two methods of taking a liver tissue sample: one using an endoscope with ultrasound (EUS) and the other using a needle through the skin (percutaneous). Researchers wanted to see which method provides better samples for diagnosing liver disease. The trial involved 90 adults with liver cirrhosis.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help doctors choose the best biopsy method for accurate liver disease diagnosis.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with 90 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both methods carry risks like pain or bleeding.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
90 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Nov 2023
- Finished
-
Nov 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients \> 18 years of age. 2. Eligibility for deep sedation with propofol. 3. Undergoing liver biopsy for diagnosis/evaluation/staging. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Coagulopathy, defined by platelet count \< 70,000/mL and/or INR \> 1.7. 2. Inability to discontinue anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents for 5 days prior to the procedure. 3. Presence of unrelieved biliary obstruction. 4. Presence of ascites. 5. Suspected or known hepatic malignancy. 6. Hypertensive patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. (SBP \>150 and/or DBP\>100mmHg) 7. Medically unfit for sedation. 8. Inability to provide informed consent. 9. Cannot understand Hindi or English should be excluded since they will not be able to reply objectively to questionnaire.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Liver cirrhosis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Institiute of liver and biliary sciences
New Delhi, 110070, India
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Gut bacteria in a capsule: a new attempt to calm a brain complication of cirrhosis
- Can a digital platform catch liver cancer sooner?
- Can a Two-Drug combo keep cirrhosis patients out of the hospital?
- Can removing the spleen help the liver fight cancer?
- Blood test may forecast which cirrhosis patients survive after discharge
- Can a parasite drug help fight a deadly gut infection in cirrhosis?