New back pain procedure could rival standard steroid shots
NCT ID NCT07445477
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two procedures for relieving pain from lumbar spinal stenosis, a common cause of back and leg pain in older adults. One group received a newer technique called erector spinae plane block, while the other got a standard caudal epidural steroid injection. Researchers measured pain, function, and walking ability in 30 adults who had not improved with other treatments. The goal is to see if the newer block works as well or better than the standard injection.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- erector spinae plane block (local anesthetic) and caudal epidural steroid injection (corticosteroid)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that erector spinae plane block is a good alternative to steroid injections for managing pain and improving function in people with lumbar spinal stenosis.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 30 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures are temporary pain relief, not a cure, and individual responses vary.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
30 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2024
- Finished
-
Feb 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
30 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: Inclusion Criteria * Age between 30 and 80 years * Patients with chronic low back pain (lasting longer than 6 months) * Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) confirmed by imaging modalities (CT/MRI) and clinical evaluation * LSS Diagnostic Support Tool Assessment (LSS-DST) score greater than 7 * Patients who did not benefit from previous conservative treatments * Presence of a signed written informed consent form indicating willingness to participate in the study LSS-DST (Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - Diagnostic Support Tool) Scoring System * Age 60-70 years: +1 point * Age over 70 years: +2 points * Absence of Diabetes Mellitus: +1 point * Positive claudication: +3 points * Symptoms aggravated by standing: +2 points * Symptoms relieved by forward flexion: +3 points * Symptoms induced by forward flexion: -1 point * Symptoms induced by lumbar extension: +1 point * Ankle-brachial index ≥ 0.9: +3 points * Abnormal Achilles tendon reflex: +1 point * Positive straight leg raise test: -2 points Exclusion Criteria: History of lumbar epidural steroid injection within the last 6 months or history of major trauma * Known allergy to the study medications (lidocaine hydrochloride, dexamethasone 21-phosphate) or to contrast agents * Presence of unstable chronic medical conditions (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure) * Advanced joint limitations preventing mobilization (e.g., hip or knee osteoarthritis) * History of previous lumbar spine surgery * Current anticoagulant therapy or history of coagulopathy * History of malignancy * History of polyneuropathy * Presence of peripheral vascular disease * Psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairment that would interfere with completion of questionnaires and assessment scales (including significant visual or hearing impairment) * Presence of local or systemic infection at the intended injection site * Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding * Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Lumbar spinal stenosis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Teaching the brain about pain before surgery may ease recovery
- Could a nasal spray shield aging brains from Post-Surgery confusion?
- Could a common hand condition reveal hidden heart disease? new imaging trial investigates
- Belly fat vs. body mass index: which better predicts spine surgery risks?
- Simple tube after spine surgery may cut complications
- New nerve block technique aims to cut opioid use after back surgery