Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New back pain procedure could rival standard steroid shots

NCT ID NCT07445477

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two procedures for relieving pain from lumbar spinal stenosis, a common cause of back and leg pain in older adults. One group received a newer technique called erector spinae plane block, while the other got a standard caudal epidural steroid injection. Researchers measured pain, function, and walking ability in 30 adults who had not improved with other treatments. The goal is to see if the newer block works as well or better than the standard injection.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
erector spinae plane block (local anesthetic) and caudal epidural steroid injection (corticosteroid)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that erector spinae plane block is a good alternative to steroid injections for managing pain and improving function in people with lumbar spinal stenosis.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study with only 30 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures are temporary pain relief, not a cure, and individual responses vary.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

30 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Oct 2024

Finished

Feb 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

30 to 80 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: Inclusion Criteria * Age between 30 and 80 years * Patients with chronic low back pain (lasting longer than 6 months) * Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) confirmed by imaging modalities (CT/MRI) and clinical evaluation * LSS Diagnostic Support Tool Assessment (LSS-DST) score greater than 7 * Patients who did not benefit from previous conservative treatments * Presence of a signed written informed consent form indicating willingness to participate in the study LSS-DST (Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - Diagnostic Support Tool) Scoring System * Age 60-70 years: +1 point * Age over 70 years: +2 points * Absence of Diabetes Mellitus: +1 point * Positive claudication: +3 points * Symptoms aggravated by standing: +2 points * Symptoms relieved by forward flexion: +3 points * Symptoms induced by forward flexion: -1 point * Symptoms induced by lumbar extension: +1 point * Ankle-brachial index ≥ 0.9: +3 points * Abnormal Achilles tendon reflex: +1 point * Positive straight leg raise test: -2 points Exclusion Criteria: History of lumbar epidural steroid injection within the last 6 months or history of major trauma * Known allergy to the study medications (lidocaine hydrochloride, dexamethasone 21-phosphate) or to contrast agents * Presence of unstable chronic medical conditions (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure) * Advanced joint limitations preventing mobilization (e.g., hip or knee osteoarthritis) * History of previous lumbar spine surgery * Current anticoagulant therapy or history of coagulopathy * History of malignancy * History of polyneuropathy * Presence of peripheral vascular disease * Psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairment that would interfere with completion of questionnaires and assessment scales (including significant visual or hearing impairment) * Presence of local or systemic infection at the intended injection site * Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding * Refusal or inability to provide informed consent

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Lumbar spinal stenosis are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital

    Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.