Which epidural method helps lung surgery patients recover faster?
NCT ID NCT05930405
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 252 adults having lung surgery to see if giving pain medicine in small bursts (programmed intermittent bolus) works better than a steady drip (continuous infusion). Both methods use an epidural, a common pain relief technique. The goal was to find which approach leads to better recovery quality in the first few days after surgery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- epidural analgesia (local anesthetic delivered via programmed intermittent bolus or continuous infusion)
- What this could lead to
- If one method works better, it could improve recovery and comfort after lung surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed trial, but the difference between methods may be small. Results may not apply to all surgeries or patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
252 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2023
- Finished
-
Oct 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Proposed lobectomy under VATS under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation 2. Agree to use epidural analgesia after surgery 3. ASA Ⅰ- Ⅲ grade 4. BMI 18.5-30 kg/m2 5. Age 18-65 years old Exclusion Criteria: 1. Preoperative refusal of surgery due to accident or subjective 2. Neurological dysfunction 3. contraindications to intralesional anesthesia 4. history of preoperative opioid use 5. Patients with abnormal preoperative pain and pain score (NRS) \> 3 6. Patients taking sedative hypnosis, anti-anxiety, and antidepressant drugs for a long time before surgery
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Video-assisted thoracic surgery are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Renchun Lai
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.