Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Feeding through a tube vs. vein: which heals gut leaks faster?

NCT ID NCT03742752

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early This study
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two ways of feeding patients who developed a leak (fistula) after upper gastrointestinal surgery: feeding through a tube into the gut (enteral nutrition) versus feeding through a vein (parenteral nutrition). The goal was to see if enteral nutrition could help close the leak faster. The trial was stopped early after enrolling only 6 people, so no strong conclusions can be drawn.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that enteral nutrition helps close fistulas faster than parenteral nutrition, improving recovery after upper GI surgery.
What could go wrong
The trial was terminated early with only 6 participants, so results are very limited. It is unclear if enteral nutrition is truly better, and more research is needed.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

6 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jun 2019

Finished

Sep 2021

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients ≥ 18 years * Patients having received upper GI surgery for benign or malignant disease including, oesophageal, gastric, duodenal or pancreatic surgery or bariatric surgery * Diagnosis of an active postoperative fistula or persisting after a failure of surgical or endoscopic procedure dedicated to close the fistula * AL diagnosed from less than 72h AND confirmed on at least two criteria among the followings: * clinical symptoms of AL * ct scan / ultrason imaging and /or endoscopic diagnosis of AL * biologic/bacteriology diagnosis on fluid output * intraoperative diagnosis of AL at time of reoperation * Indication of nil per mouth * American society of anesthesiologist score 1, 2 or 3 * In case of neoplasm, absence of peritoneal carcinomatosis or distant metastasis * No severe concomitant uncontrolled disease * Life expectancy more than 6 months * No history of allergy or study product intolerance * Ongoing healthcare insurance Exclusion Criteria: * \- Scheduled surgical or endoscopic treatment with the aim to close the fistula (suture, prosthesis, clip or glue). In case of such treatment failure, patients are eligible to participate to the study. Endoscopic or surgical drainage are not exclusion criteria (meaning that drainage only is authorized before randomization) * History of or current severe uncontrolled cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal or liver failure * Uncontrolled sepsis related to the AL * Malnutrition requiring combined nutritional treatment with the enteral AND parenteral routes together * Untreated or persistent Peritoneal carcinomatosis or distant metastasis * Pregnant and/or lactating women * Freedom privacy

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Enteral nutritional support are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Digestive System Fistula Hyperphagia intestinal fistula

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHU

    Lille, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.