New hip cup design aims to stop common complication in elderly fracture patients
NCT ID NCT03909815
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether a special type of hip implant (dual mobility cup) can prevent the hip from popping out of place after a total hip replacement for a broken hip. The trial involved 1,600 elderly patients with a specific type of hip fracture. Researchers compared the dual mobility cup to standard cups to see which one led to fewer dislocations within one year after surgery.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
1,600 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2020
- Finished
-
Sep 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
65 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Written informed consent * Diagnosis: displaced femoral neck fracture type AO 31-B2 or B3/Garden type 3 or 4 * Eligible for THA according to local guidelines and routines Exclusion Criteria: * Previous inclusion of contralateral hip * Delayed fracture surgery (date of injury \>7 days prior to date of randomization) * Pathological or stress fracture of the femoral neck, or fracture adjacent to a previous ipsilateral hip implant * Inability or unwillingness to give written consent * Dementia (as diagnosed by the screening physician) * Unavailability of both interventions for a study subject (e.g., implants being out of stock, or lack of the individual surgeon's expertise to perform either procedure)
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Femoral neck fractures are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Nils Hailer
Uppsala, 75185, Sweden
-
Queen Mary University of London
London, United Kingdom
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a cementless hip stem hold up in asian patients?
- Can a bone marrow injection save young hips after fracture?
- Could a simple drink rebuild strength after a hip fracture?
- New hip fracture fixation device put to the test against traditional screws
- Anesthesia choice may influence blood loss in hip fracture surgery
- Hip replacement study reveals hidden socket damage risk