Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New eye drops aim to soothe dry eyes with fewer doses

NCT ID NCT07422259

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This completed study tested whether Reinnerva/Lubristil+G eye drops work better than Vismed for people with dry eyes. Forty adults with dry eye symptoms used one drop in each eye twice daily (Reinnerva/Lubristil+G) or four times daily (Vismed) for 60 days. Researchers measured tear production, tear film stability, and symptom scores to see which drop provided more relief.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Reinnerva/Lubristil+G sterile eye drops (artificial tears)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could offer a more convenient option for relieving dry eye symptoms with fewer daily applications.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed post-market study with only 40 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It compares two artificial tears, not a new treatment.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

40 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jun 2025

Finished

Sep 2025

Lead sponsor

A company

The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 80 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Signed informed consent * Male and female, aged 18 to 80 years * Alteration of the tear film or bilateral ocular surface discomfort resulting from one of the following conditions: Patients receiving chronic therapy with antihypertensive eye drops; Patients receiving post-ocular surgery therapy for at least 15 days * At least two of the following symptoms of dry eye: burning, stinging, dry eye sensation, foreign body sensation, photophobia * At least two of the following: Schirmer's test (8 mm lower in 5 minutes) BUT (Burning Time) less than 10 seconds Fluorescein Infection Infection (NEI) score ≥3 Exclusion Criteria: * Active keratitis caused by herpes simplex, vaccinia virus, varicella-zoster, and other viral infections of the cornea and conjunctiva * Current bacterial, fungal, and tuberculosis infections * Corneal stromal perforations and ulcers * Hypersensitivity to any of the product components * Current ocular allergy or allergic rhinitis * Participation in a clinical trial in the month prior to the start of the study * Systemic anti-acne therapy in the 6 months prior to the start of the study * Any change in systemic therapy in the month prior to the start of the study * Contact lens use in the week prior to the start of the study

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Keratoconjunctivitis sicca are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • UOC of Ophthalmology, AOU Policlinico "G. Martino"

    Messina, 98125, Italy

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.