Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Can a Hand-Placed catheter keep blood pressure readings steady during robotic surgery?

NCT ID NCT07732296

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 28, 2026 · Last updated Aug 06, 2026 · Updated 3 times

Summary

During robot-assisted urologic surgery, the patient's arms are tucked at their sides, which can kink or compress a standard wrist artery catheter, causing inaccurate blood pressure readings. This trial tests whether placing the catheter in the distal radial artery (near the back of the hand or anatomical snuffbox) reduces such problems. Seventy adults scheduled for robotic urologic surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either a conventional wrist catheter or a distal hand catheter. The study will track how often each method leads to catheter dysfunction requiring intervention.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If distal radial catheterization proves more stable, it could reduce the need for troubleshooting or replacement during arm-tucked surgeries, improving patient safety and workflow.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center study with 70 participants, so results may not apply broadly. The procedure itself carries standard risks like bleeding or infection.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 70 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Aug 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Dec 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

19 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 19 years or older * Scheduled to undergo robot-assisted urologic surgery under general anesthesia * Scheduled to have both arms positioned alongside the body in an arm-tucked position during surgery * Considered by the attending anesthesiologist to require intraoperative invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring * Able and willing to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Refusal to participate or inability to provide written informed consent * Emergency surgery * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Lack of decision-making capacity requiring consent from a legally authorized representative * Presence of an arteriovenous fistula for dialysis or unsuitable bilateral radial artery access * Infection, burn, trauma, surgical scar, or severe skin lesion at the intended puncture site * Suspected hand perfusion impairment, including radial artery occlusion, absent radial pulse, severe peripheral vascular disease, or Raynaud phenomenon * Severe coagulopathy or uncorrected bleeding tendency for which radial arterial catheterization is considered inappropriate * Any condition for which the attending anesthesiologist considers study participation inappropriate for participant safety

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Arterial catheter dysfunction are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  2. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.