Spine procedure safe: no extra disc damage after 10 years
NCT ID NCT07567404
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study followed 50 people with chronic low back pain for 10 years after they had a procedure that punctured a spinal disc. Researchers used MRI scans to check if the punctured disc wore out faster than expected. The main goal was to see if the puncture itself caused extra damage. Results suggest that the procedure does not speed up disc degeneration over a decade.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
50 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2022
- Finished
-
May 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
A research network
The lead sponsor is a research network or cooperative group.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
To be included in the retrospective study, patients must have undergone one of the specified intradiscal procedures, successfully established contact, voluntarily agreed to participate, and demonstrated sufficient language proficiency to complete study assessments.
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients eligible for early intradiscal procedures included those with low back pain (NRS \> 5) caused by discogenic pain due to disc degeneration or radicular pain due to disc protrusion and subsequent nerve root compression. All patients were required to have been resistant to conservative therapy. Diagnoses were based on patient history, physical examination, imaging studies, and, in some cases, provocative discography if discogenic pain could not otherwise be clearly identified. Exclusion Criteria: * • Perioperative complications. * Post-interventional lumbar spine surgery in the region to be examined. * Contraindications for a repeated MRI. * Metastases or infection of the spine since surgery. * Spinal canal stenosis. * A diagnosis of anxiety disorder, depression, or somatoform disorder since surgery, based on their medical history.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Chronic low back pain (CLBP) are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Sportklinik, Klinikum Stuttgart
Stuttgart, 70374, Germany
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can zapping muscles boost back pain relief?
- Can a VR headset make acupuncture work better for back pain?
- Can antibiotics cure a common form of back pain?
- Can a sleep hormone ease chronic back pain?
- Blood test may spot worn spinal discs behind chronic back pain
- Can a Screen-Based tai chi class ease back pain?