Digital smile showdown: which design workflow creates more accurate temporary veneers?
NCT ID NCT07213453
First seen Oct 31, 2025 · Last updated May 23, 2026 · Updated 20 times
Summary
This study tested two computer-based methods for designing temporary tooth veneers. Five healthy adults with good oral hygiene and intact front teeth took part. Researchers compared a 2D-to-3D method using SmileCloud software against a direct 3D method using Exocad Smile Creator. The goal was to see which workflow produced more accurate temporary restorations when 3D printed.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ESTHETICS, DENTAL are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Marmara University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.