Digital smile showdown: which design workflow wins for temporary veneers?

NCT ID NCT07213453

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tested two digital methods for designing temporary veneers (thin tooth covers) to see which one makes more accurate restorations. Five healthy adults with good teeth and oral hygiene took part. Researchers compared a 2D-to-3D method using photos versus a direct 3D method using scans. The goal was to find out which digital workflow produces temporary veneers that match the planned design more closely.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ESTHETICS, DENTAL are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Marmara University

    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.