Tooth powder vs blood gel: which helps implants hold better?
NCT ID NCT07396350
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested two types of natural membranes used during dental implant surgery after a tooth is pulled. Forty adults with a non-restorable molar in the lower jaw received an implant right away, covered with either a membrane made from their own tooth or one made from their blood. The goal was to see which membrane helped the implant stay more stable over 2 years.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
40 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2024
- Finished
-
Jan 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 55 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Eligibility Criteria: 1. Patients aged 18 years and older. 2. Non-restorable mandibular molars requiring extraction and GBR for immediate implant placement. 3. The tooth that required extraction showed no clinical or radiographic signs of acute infection. 4. There was at least 5 mm of available bone between the superior border of the inferior alveolar canal and the root apex. 5. At least 8 mm inter-arch space for the prosthesis. 6. Patients were free of systemic conditions that absolutely contraindicate implant insertion. 7. Patients with good oral hygiene. 8. Patients capable of adhering to the mandated follow-up appointments. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Tobacco Smokers. 2. Pregnancy. 3. Patients with a history of radiation to the head and neck. 4. Bruxism and parafunctional habits
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Tooth extraction are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Mansoura university
Al Mansurah, 002, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- The race to save jawbone: four socket techniques go head to head
- Your extracted tooth may become the next bone graft
- Can a natural compound help preserve jawbone after tooth loss?
- Can a bone graft boost jawbone healing around new implants?
- Can a simple phone call speed up tooth extraction recovery?
- Can a 3D-Printed tooth preserve your gum line after extraction?