Tooth sensitivity showdown: lasers vs. bee product gel in new study
NCT ID NCT07647861
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested four approaches for treating dentine hypersensitivity (tooth sensitivity): Nd:YAG laser, diode laser, a herbal propolis-based gel, and a sham (fake) treatment. 140 adults with at least two sensitive teeth were followed for 12 months to see which method reduced pain best. The goal is to find a reliable, long-lasting solution for this common problem.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Herbal propolis-based dentin barrier agent
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could point toward effective, long-lasting treatments for tooth sensitivity using lasers or natural products.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with 140 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The sham group helps control for placebo effects, but real-world effectiveness could differ.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
140 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2025
- Finished
-
Jun 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged between 18 and 65 years. * Presence of at least two hypersensitive teeth. * Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 4 or higher (VAS \>= 4) following stimulus. * Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale score of 2 or higher (Schiff \>= 2). * Presence of vital teeth in the target area. * Patient is willing and able to provide written informed consent prior to study initiation. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy or lactation. * Presence of active periodontal disease in the target area. * Teeth with dental caries, deep restorations, or cracked tooth syndrome. * Endodontically treated teeth. * History of allergy or hypersensitivity related to the materials, products, or chemical agents used in the study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dentine hypersensitivity are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology
Samsun, Samsun, 55270, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.