Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New dental implant design shows promise in small study

NCT ID NCT05676268

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested how well dental implants with ceramic extensions (cantilevers) work after at least 1 year. Researchers followed 35 healthy adults who needed replacement teeth. They checked implant survival, bone changes, and any complications. The goal was to see if this approach is reliable for everyday use.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could provide evidence that ceramic cantilever extensions on dental implants are a reliable option for replacing missing teeth.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early proof-of-principle study with only 35 participants and a short follow-up of 1 year. Results may not apply to everyone, and long-term success is unknown.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

35 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2023

Finished

Dec 2023

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Patients with missing teeth rehabilitated with dental implants supporting partial fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions

Ages

18 to 99 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged ≥18 years * Written informed consent * Patients with systemic health or controlled medical conditions * Patients with healthy or treated periodontal conditions * Patients enrolled in regular supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) * Patients without clinical signs of bruxism and/or oral parafunctions * 2 osseointegrated dental implants in the canine or posterior areas of maxilla and mandible following transmucosal placement and healing of 3-6 months * Tissue level solid-screw implants with a sand-blasted and acid- etched (SLA) surface with an endosseous diameter of 3.3, 4.1 or 4.8 mm, a length of 8, 10 or 12 mm, a shoulder diameter of 4.8 mm and a supracrestal machined neck with a height of 1.8 or 2.8 mm (Straumann® Dental Implant System, Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) * Full-ceramic * Utilization of prefabricated titanium abutments * Cemented (3M™ ESPE Ketac™ Cem, Seefeld, Germany) or screw-retained fixed dental prostheses with a mesial or distal cantilever extension (FDPCs) * Cantilever extension corresponding to 1 premolar unit (i.e., 6-7 mm) * Absence of occlusal contacts or guidance on the cantilever extension at baseline * Opposing dentition consisting of natural teeth or fixed or removable prosthetic restorations * Availability of a periapical radiograph at baseline (i.e. FDPC delivery) * Availability of PPD measurements (mm) taken at baseline at 4 sites/implant with a graduated Michigan periodontal probe (Deppeler SA, Rolle, Switzerland) * Availability of BoP measurements (%) (Lang et al., 1986) taken at baseline at 4 sites/implant with a graduated Michigan periodontal probe (Deppeler SA, Rolle, Switzerland). Exclusion Criteria: * Untreated or active periodontal diseases * Immediate implant placement (i.e., Type I implant placement according to Hämmerle et al., 2004) * FDPCs in the aesthetic zone (i.e., replacement of maxillary or mandibular incisors) * FDPCs supported by hollow-screw and hollow-cylinder implants

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental implant failed are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Peri-Implantitis Prosthesis Failure

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Department of Periodontology, University of Bern

    Bern, 3010, Switzerland

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.