Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Dental filling showdown: which material lasts longer?

NCT ID NCT07575282

First seen May 11, 2026 · Last updated Jun 22, 2026 · Updated 7 times

Summary

This study compares two types of dental fillings for cavities in the back teeth. Researchers will test a bulk-fill flowable resin against a submicron hybrid resin in 25 patients over 18 months. The goal is to see which filling performs better in terms of shape, comfort, and appearance.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARIES CLASS I are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

dental filling materials (bulk-fill flowable resin and submicron hybrid resin)

What this could lead to

If successful, this could show which filling material works better and lasts longer for treating cavities in back teeth.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage trial with only 25 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The study hasn't started yet, and findings are limited to 18 months.

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

dental caries

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.