Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Breathing tube removal: inflated or deflated? study seeks answer

NCT ID NCT06990308

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only This study
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two methods of removing a breathing tube after surgery under general anesthesia: deflating the cuff first (standard) or keeping it inflated. Researchers want to see which method better prevents fluids from entering the windpipe and lungs. About 88 healthy adults having non-airway surgery will take part, and a chest X-ray will check for any fluid leakage.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If it works, this could point toward a safer standard method for removing breathing tubes during anesthesia.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study in healthy adults, so results may not apply to sicker patients or emergency surgeries. The outcome is based on a dye test, not direct patient harm.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 88 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jun 2025

Expected to finish

Sep 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

A government agency

The lead sponsor is a US federal agency other than the NIH.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 50 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 to 50 years old * Scheduled for surgery, not of the airway, head, or neck, with anticipated case duration of less than 3 hours * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification of 1 to 3 Exclusion Criteria: * Emergent surgery, or surgery requiring prone, sitting or lateral positioning * Pre-existing laryngeal pathology, obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, active respiratory infection, recent pneumonia, uncontrolled asthma, or uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux disease * Known difficulties with general anesthesia, such as prior anaphylactic reaction, difficult intubation or mask ventilation * Known allergy to iohexol or a previous severe reaction to any contrast agents * Unfavorable airway examination, such as Mallampati 4, limited mouth opening, and/or inability to extend neck * Non-compliance with ASA Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting * Pregnancy * Enrollment in another anesthesiology or surgery related interventional research study * Surgeries scheduled on Friday or a day immediately prior to a holiday

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Anesthesia airway management are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune

    Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, 28547, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.