Back surgery showdown: which procedure is better for spinal stenosis?
NCT ID NCT02348645
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This pilot study tested whether a larger trial is possible comparing two standard surgeries for lumbar spinal stenosis with a related condition called spondylolisthesis. The two procedures are decompression alone and decompression with fusion. The study enrolled 70 surgical candidates and focused on feasibility, such as recruitment rates and patient adherence, rather than final treatment outcomes.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this pilot could pave the way for a larger trial that helps surgeons decide which surgery is better for this common back condition.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small pilot study with only 70 participants, focused on feasibility, not on proving which treatment works best. Results may not apply to all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
70 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2015
- Finished
-
Aug 2023
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
50 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients deemed to be surgical candidates with focal (1-2 level) lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and associated stable degenerative spondylolisthesis with the following characteristics: 1. a clinical history of back, buttock and leg pain with walking or standing that is improved when lying, sitting or bending forward 2. a clinical history of leg symptoms that are greater than or equal to back symptoms with walking or standing, and 3. greater than 6 months of symptoms with failed conservative care * aged 50 or over * sufficient fluency in English or French to provide informed consent and complete questionnaires with or without the need of an interpreter Exclusion Criteria: * Greater than 25% listhesis or spinal instability as demonstrated by motion (\>5mm of translation) on flexion extension radiographs or non-loaded (MRI/CT or supine x-rays) to loaded imaging (standing radiograph) * Presence of kyphosis (\>0 degrees at the affected level or globally), degenerative scoliosis (\>10 degree using the Cobb method) with rotatory or lateral listhesis on preoperative x-rays * Clinical history of osteoporotic fracture or chronic oral steroid use * Previous posterior lumbar spinal surgery (excluding prior microdiscectomy) * Patients who have evidence of neurological disorders that affect physical function (e.g. peripheral neuropathy), neuromuscular disorders (e.g. multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's etc.) or systemic illness (e.g. inflammatory arthritis) that affects physical function
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Degenerative spondylolisthesis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2N9, Canada
-
London Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
-
Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
-
Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada
-
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
-
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
-
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can keyhole spine fusion ease chronic back pain?
- Can ultrasound dye reveal spinal cord damage Mid-Surgery?
- Teaching the brain about pain before surgery may ease recovery
- Can a new bone graft match the gold standard for spinal fusion?
- Could a nasal spray shield aging brains from Post-Surgery confusion?
- Can a growth factor from donor bone improve spinal fusion?