Can less be more? study tests cutting back antibiotics in sepsis
NCT ID NCT01626612
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at whether it is safe to reduce or narrow antibiotics once doctors know which germ is causing a severe infection (sepsis). 120 intensive care patients were randomly assigned to either continue their original broad antibiotics or switch to a more targeted treatment. The goal was to see if the de-escalation approach could keep patients safe while reducing the risk of drug-resistant infections.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 3
Large-scale testing in a bigger group. Usually the last step before a treatment can be approved.
- Participants
-
120 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Feb 2012
- Finished
-
Jul 2013
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Major Subject; * Subject having a sepsis engraves(burns) defined according to the following criteria during the initiation of the probability antibiotic treatment: * Criteria of SIRS \[ 14 \], * And a suspected infection, * And a failure of organ: low blood pressure, respiratory failure, coma, hepatic insufficiency, renal insufficiency, thrombopénia, spontaneous extension of the TCA, * Subject for which an antibiotic treatment was begun within 6 hours following the diagnosis of sepsis engraves(burns); * Subject for which a taking with microbiological aim was made within 48 hours following the diagnosis of sepsis Exclusion Criteria: * Minor Subject, pregnant or breast-feeding woman; * Neutropénia (PN \< 1000 / mm3); * Absence of identification of a microorganism in the microbiological examinations; * Absence of Social Security; * Subject deprived of freedom or under guardianship; * Subject for which the lit(enlightened) consent is not collected(taken in) (itself and/or reliable person).
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Severe sepsis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
Marseille, 13354, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can tracking antibiotic levels in the blood improve sepsis care?
- Blood filtering may save children with sepsis
- Sepsis immune cell study ends early
- Can zinc help fight sepsis? early study explores dosing
- New blood marker could speed up sepsis diagnosis in emergency rooms
- Massive data dive aims to tame sepsis in kids