Dental crown showdown: which method saves kids' teeth better?
NCT ID NCT06350578
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two techniques for placing stainless steel crowns on children's baby molars with cavities: the Hall technique (no drilling, crown cemented directly) and the conventional method (drilling and shaping the tooth first). Eighty children aged 3-9 participated, and researchers tracked crown and tooth survival over 12 months. The goal was to see which approach leads to fewer failures and better long-term outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
80 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2023
- Finished
-
Aug 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
3 to 9 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Participant inclusion criteria: PHCC paediatric dental patients: 1. Whose parents or legal guardians accept and sign the consent form 2. Who assent to participation. 3. Who aged 3-9 years old. 4. Who exhibit generally cooperative behavior. 5. Who exhibit good general health conditions. 6. Who are presenting at least one occluso-proximal lesion in a primary molar. Tooth/ carious lesion inclusion criteria: 1\. From clinical and radiographic examination, caries limited to the occluso-proximal surfaces and extending to enamel or dentine, cavitated or non cavitated. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Uncooperative children who do not understand the procedure or tolerate biting the crown into its position without local anesthesia. 2. Children with special health care needs (SHCN) will be excluded. 3. Children with nickel allergies and sensitivity. Tooth/ caries lesion exclusion criteria: 1. Tooth with signs or symptoms of dental infection or irreversible pulpitis such as: A history of spontaneous unprovoked pain, a sinus tract, soft tissue inflammation not resulting from gingivitis or periodontitis, excessive mobility not associated with trauma or exfoliation, furcation/ apical radiolucency, or radiographic evidence of internal/ external resorption (Camp JH 2011). 2. Crowns severely destructed with caries, which considered non-restorable (Innes, N.P 2009). 3. Teeth with single surface (occlusal) caries.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Approximal dental caries (icdas 3-5) in primary molars of children are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Primary Healthcare Corporation
Doha, Qatar