Eczema cream showdown: steroid vs Non-Steroid in kids
NCT ID NCT07537751
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested two creams for mild to moderate eczema in 40 children aged 1-12. One cream was a steroid (fluticasone), the other a non-steroid (crisaborole). Both were applied twice daily for 6 weeks, then twice weekly for 12 weeks if the skin improved a lot. Both treatments worked well; the steroid worked faster, but the non-steroid showed a trend toward keeping eczema away longer.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Crisaborole 2% ointment and fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that crisaborole is a good non-steroid option for children with eczema, possibly with fewer relapses than steroid creams.
- What could go wrong
- This was a small, completed trial with only 40 children, so results may not apply to all patients. The trend toward fewer relapses with crisaborole needs confirmation in larger studies.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
40 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Feb 2024
- Finished
-
Mar 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
1 year to 12 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Children of either sex aged 1 to 12 years. * Clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis based on Hanifin and Rajka criteria. * Mild to moderate disease with objective SCORAD up to 40. * Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) score of 2 (mild) or 3 (moderate) at baseline. Exclusion Criteria: * Use of systemic corticosteroids, nonsteroidal systemic immunosuppressants (e.g., cyclosporine, methotrexate), or phototherapy within 4 weeks before baseline. * Use of topical corticosteroids, transdermal corticosteroids, topical antibiotics, or any medicated topical agent within 1 week before baseline. * Severe atopic dermatitis (objective SCORAD \> 40). * Significant medical condition requiring systemic medication (e.g., cancer). * Current clinical diagnosis of bacterial skin infection (such as abscess or impetigo).
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Atopic dermatitis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of Medicine, Kafr Elsheikh University
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Gut bacteria may hold clues to dozens of diseases
- Skin scans may predict who responds to dupilumab for eczema
- Can a daily liquid medicine calm severe eczema in toddlers and preschoolers?
- Scientists probe whether lebrikizumab rewires diseased skin at the molecular level
- Can a Lab-Made antibody calm severe eczema?
- Is your nose fueling infected eczema and scabies sores?