Which breathing machine works best for lung fluid emergencies?
NCT ID NCT00213681
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two breathing devices—CPAP and bilevel ventilation—in people with severe fluid buildup in the lungs (pulmonary edema). The goal was to see which device improves breathing faster. Participants were adults in respiratory distress. The results could help doctors choose the best emergency treatment.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Boussignac CPAP device and bilevel pressure support ventilation device
- What this could lead to
- If one device works better, it could help doctors choose the best breathing support for people with severe fluid in the lungs.
- What could go wrong
- This trial is completed but small; results may not apply to all patients. Both devices are already used, so no major breakthrough is expected.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 3
Large-scale testing in a bigger group. Usually the last step before a treatment can be approved.
- Start date
-
Nov 2002
- Finished
-
Dec 2005
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
16 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * age \> 16 yrs, acute onset of severe respiratory distress, bilateral rales and typical findings of congestion on chest radiograph * breathing frequency of \> 30/min, SpO2 \>90%, use of accessory respiratory muscles
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Severe acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU de ROUEN
Rouen, 76031, France