Which breathing machine works best for lung fluid emergencies?

NCT ID NCT00213681

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two breathing devices—CPAP and bilevel ventilation—in people with severe fluid buildup in the lungs (pulmonary edema). The goal was to see which device improves breathing faster. Participants were adults in respiratory distress. The results could help doctors choose the best emergency treatment.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

Boussignac CPAP device and bilevel pressure support ventilation device

What this could lead to

If one device works better, it could help doctors choose the best breathing support for people with severe fluid in the lungs.

What could go wrong

This trial is completed but small; results may not apply to all patients. Both devices are already used, so no major breakthrough is expected.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SEVERE ACUTE CARDIOGENIC PULMONARY EDEMA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

pulmonary edema respiratory failure

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • CHU de ROUEN

    Rouen, 76031, France