Spinal catheter may offer better pain control after hip surgery
NCT ID NCT06625606
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested whether giving numbing medicine through a thin tube (catheter) placed in the spine provides better pain relief after hip surgery than a single injection. 105 patients over age 60 were randomly assigned to one of three groups: continuous spinal anesthesia, single-shot spinal anesthesia, or general anesthesia. The researchers measured pain scores, need for extra pain medicine, and blood pressure changes during and after surgery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- bupivacaine (a numbing medicine given into the spinal fluid)
- What this could lead to
- If continuous spinal anesthesia works better, it could offer longer-lasting pain relief after hip surgery with fewer side effects.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with 105 patients. Results may not apply to all surgeries or patients, and the catheter technique carries a small risk of infection or headache.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
105 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2024
- Finished
-
Dec 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
60 to 75 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade ≤III; * Patients were assigned for elective surgical intervention for Fixation of Neck Femur; * Patients were free of exclusion criteria. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade \>III; * Patients who had uncontrolled hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus; * Patients who had uncompensated cardiac, renal, or hepatic diseases; * Patients with coagulopathy, spinal deformity, allergy, or contraindication for the used drugs; * Patients who refused to sign the informed consent were excluded from the study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Fractured neck of femur are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Benha University
Banhā, El Qalyoubia, 13511, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which nerve block wins the battle against chest surgery pain?
- Which nerve block wins the battle against Post-Surgery pain?
- Can a pre-surgery paracetamol and tramadol combo beat fentanyl for day-case pain?
- Insulin eye drops put to the test for faster corneal healing
- Can a Longer-Lasting nerve block cut opioid use after spine surgery?
- Could a simple mineral calm the Body's Post-Surgery fire?