Sinus surgery showdown: crushing vs cutting for a common nose problem
NCT ID NCT06687629
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at two methods to treat concha bullosa, a condition where the middle turbinate in the nose is enlarged and can block sinuses. 62 adults with chronic sinusitis were randomly assigned to have the turbinate crushed or partially removed during sinus surgery. After one year, the researchers checked symptoms and healing to see which method caused fewer problems like scar tissue or the turbinate refilling.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- concha bullosa crushing or resection (procedure)
- What this could lead to
- If crushing works better, it could become the preferred, less invasive way to treat concha bullosa during sinus surgery, reducing complications like adhesions.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 62 patients. Crushing might not last and the turbinate could refill. Results may not apply to everyone.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
62 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2018
- Finished
-
Dec 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * chronic or recurrent rhinosinusitis * 3 months of regular nasal corticosteroid usage * No prior endoscopic procedures of the paranasal sinuses * EPOS criteria for CRS are met: inflammation of the paranasal sinuses with at least 2 symptoms, one of which must be nasal obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge (anterior/posterior): * facial pain/pressure in the facial area * reduced or lost sense of smell SNOT-22 25 or higher * Complications of CRS (e.g., mucocele) * Pregnancy/breastfeeding or plans for them in the near future * Coagulation disorders * Systemic diseases: cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dysfunction, sarcoidosis, Wegener's granulomatosis * Immunosuppression: diagnosed SAD, CVI, HIV, or use of biological/immunosuppressive drugs * Immunotherapy * Daily use of systemic corticosteroids * Communication issues (non-Finnish-speaking patient, neurological/psychiatric problems) * SNOT-22 score \< 25
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Chronic rhinosinusitis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Helsinki University Hospital Ear Clinic
Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00130, Finland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a plant oil spray tame chronic sinusitis with fewer steroids?
- Can a new anesthetic give surgeons a clearer view during sinus surgery?
- Can a simple seawater spray tame cold and sinus misery?
- A gentle touch against coughs and colds: could manual therapy shorten respiratory illness?
- Could a second surgical step clear Kids' stuffy noses better?
- Can smarter surveillance sharpen pneumonia vaccines?