Can smarter surveillance sharpen pneumonia vaccines?
NCT ID NCT04447521
First seen Aug 03, 2026 · Last updated Aug 04, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study observes people in Belgium with non-invasive pneumococcal infections like pneumonia, ear infections, and sinusitis. Researchers will collect bacterial samples to see which strains are circulating and how they compare to invasive infections. The goal is to understand how well current vaccines are working and whether adjustments are needed.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- This surveillance could help refine vaccination programs to better protect against pneumonia, ear infections, and sinusitis.
- What could go wrong
- As an observational study, it won't test a new treatment. Findings may not directly change policy without further research.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
1,404 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2020
- Finished
-
Dec 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients suffering from non-invasive pneumococcal disease (diagnosed as CAP, sinusitis and otitits media) and living in Belgium at the time of the study.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients living in Belgium at the time of the study, * from whom unduplicated S. pneumoniae isolates were collected in routine practices, * from non-invasive upper (e.g.: pus/fluid from nasal sinus or from otitis media fluid) or lower respiratory tract (e.g. sputum bronchial or endotracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar fluid (BAL),…) clinical samples, * from patients diagnosed with pneumonia, sinusitis and otitis. Exclusion Criteria: • Patients for whom S. pneumoniae was simultaneously isolated from blood or another usually sterile specimen
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Otitis media are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Sciensano
Brussels, 1180, Belgium
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a digital assistant and quick tests stop unnecessary antibiotics for kids?
- Community ear health workers may curb hearing loss in aboriginal kids
- Nasal swab could curb unnecessary antibiotics in pneumonia
- Can a tiny ear tube offer lasting relief for middle ear infections?
- AI could outsmart bacteria: a smarter way to choose antibiotics?
- Breathing technique may outperform spirometry for smog pneumonia recovery