Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Uterus-Saving surgery showdown: which fix works best for pelvic organ prolapse?

NCT ID NCT06982157

Disease control Sponsor: Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two surgical techniques for pelvic organ prolapse that keep the uterus in place: vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation and laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension. Researchers followed 111 women for up to two years after surgery, checking both symptoms and physical exam results. The goal is to find out which method works better and for whom, so doctors can offer more personalized care.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
surgery (vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation vs. laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension)
What this could lead to
If this study shows one surgery is clearly better, it could help doctors choose the best approach for each patient, reducing repeat prolapse and improving recovery.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-hospital study with only 111 patients. Results may not apply to everyone, and both surgeries have risks like pain or future prolapse.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

111 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jul 2020

Finished

Jul 2022

Lead sponsor

A government agency

The lead sponsor is a government body.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Women who underwent vaginal sacrospinous suspension and laparoscopic uterosacral Sacrospinous ligament fixation

Ages

18 to 99 years

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * From the general Urogynecological cohort who underwent vaginal sacrospinous suspension and laparoscopic uterosacral Sacrospinous ligament fixation at Hillel Yaffe Hospital. Exclusion Criteria: * None

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Hysterectomy are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

pelvic organ prolapse

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Hysterectomy Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) Pelvic organ prolapse vaginal surgery

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hille Yaffe Medical Center

    Hadera, 3881000, Israel

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.