Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Which prolapse surgery is better? new study compares two fixation methods

NCT ID NCT03005613

Disease control Sponsor: Peking Union Medical College Hospital Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two surgical techniques to fix uterine or vaginal prolapse: sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and ischial spine fascia fixation (ISFF). Researchers wanted to see which method works better and improves quality of life more. The study included 76 women aged 40-65 with moderate to severe prolapse. Results will help doctors choose the best approach for each patient.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

76 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2017

Finished

Feb 2023

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

25 to 65 years

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * age≤65 years, for those scheduled to receive hysterectomy age≥40 years * patients with symptomatic stage II\~IV uterine or vaginal vault prolapse * receiving SSLF or ISFF in the gynecological department at Peking Union Medical College Hospital Exclusion Criteria: * plans to live abroad within follow-up span * contradiction to these two operations: acute genital infection, narrow vagina (less than two finger-breadth), too-ill to receive operations * patients with hip joint problem who could not pose a lithotomy position

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Urogenital prolapse are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

pelvic organ prolapse

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Urogenital prolapse

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Department of Ob & Gyn, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.