Keyhole vs. scope: which stone surgery wins?
NCT ID NCT07197385
First seen Nov 01, 2025 · Last updated May 20, 2026 · Updated 24 times
Summary
This study compared two common surgeries for removing large upper ureteral stones (10-20 mm): ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS), where a thin scope breaks the stone through the urinary passage, and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU), where small abdominal incisions allow direct stone removal. Fifty-six adults with a single stone were randomly assigned to one procedure. Researchers measured operation time, hospital stay, pain, complications, and stone-free rate after four weeks to determine which method is safer and more effective.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for UROLITHIASIS are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.