Keyhole vs. scope: which stone surgery wins?

NCT ID NCT07197385

First seen Nov 01, 2025 · Last updated May 20, 2026 · Updated 24 times

Summary

This study compared two common surgeries for removing large upper ureteral stones (10-20 mm): ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS), where a thin scope breaks the stone through the urinary passage, and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU), where small abdominal incisions allow direct stone removal. Fifty-six adults with a single stone were randomly assigned to one procedure. Researchers measured operation time, hospital stay, pain, complications, and stone-free rate after four weeks to determine which method is safer and more effective.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for UROLITHIASIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Lahore General Hospital, Lahore

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.