Anesthesia study compares two induction methods to improve brain monitoring accuracy
NCT ID NCT07237477
First seen Nov 19, 2025 · Last updated May 22, 2026 · Updated 25 times
Summary
This study looked at 70 adults having planned surgery to compare two methods of giving propofol anesthesia: a slow versus a rapid induction. Researchers checked how well each method matched readings from a brain monitor (BIS/Conox). The goal was to see which approach better predicts the drug's effect on the brain during the first 20 minutes after the patient loses consciousness.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PHARMACODYNAMICS are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Hospital Base san José de Osorno
Osorno, Los Lagos Region, 5290000, Chile
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.